Home
Schedule
Joys and Concerns
Meeting Map
Roster
Church
Photos
Topics
Feedback
Bible Study
Study Links
Roosey Roads Men's Fellowship

Welcome to the Grace's Men's Fellowship Information Site

Grace Men’s Bible Study Class Schedule for 2010

Men’s Fellowship will continue the study of John on Saturday morning, April 10th, at Dwight and Becky Yarbrough's house, 5501 Great Tree Court,  Fairfax, Va  22032-3145. The breakfast starts at 8 AM. The discussion leader is Dwight Yarbrough who will lead us in a discussion of Session 7 of John. Please call Dwight at 571 278-2417 or email him at dyarbrough@saftas.com  by Thursday April 8th , if you plan on coming so that he has a count for food preparation. Look at the http://www.josephsmiller.com/GraceMensFellowship/map.htm  for directions.  Hope to see you there!

__________________________________

Summary

The Grace Men’s Bible Study Class kicks off another exciting season of studying God’s word with the upcoming 2009-2010 schedule.  This year’s class will be lead by Dwight Yarbrough and coordination of the bible studies will be made by Joe Miller who will keep everyone updated via his web page which can be located at this web address: http://www.josephsmiller.com/GraceMensFellowship/  or you can send Dwight Yarbrough an email to his home address: dyarbrough@verizon.net. Dwight may also be contacted via his cell phone number at: (571) 278-2417 to RSVP by Thursday Oct 8th , if you plan on coming so that he has a count for food preparation.

Grace Men’s Bible Study begins each month’s meetings at the host’s home with Prayer followed by a Breakfast Fellowship and then an hour’s Bible Study closing with the Prayer Concerns offered by the attendees that week.  Each month a new member will be asked to volunteer to host the Men’s Bible Study group at their home.

The remaining six Bible Study dates will be November 14th, 2009; December 12th, 2009; January 16th, 2010; February 13th, 2010; March 13th, 2010; April 10th, 2010 and concluding on Lesson Number Eight on May 8th, 2010.

 

 

____________________________________________________________-

Introduction to the Study of the Book of John

 

I feel a good deal like the late Dr. J. Vernon McGee as I attempt to introduce this study. In his “Through the Bible” series which he did on the radio and in print, Dr. McGee used to speak of each new book in his study as the “greatest book in the Bible.” Let’s face it, they’re all great. But there are certain books of the Bible that just seem to stand out, and the Gospel of John is surely one of those books. It is the book of the Bible we encourage non-Christians to read, in the hope that its message will lead them to faith in Christ (after all, that is the purpose of the book—see John 20:31). On previous occasions when I have taught John’s Gospel in home Bible studies, I have seen people come to faith as the message of this book captivated them. I well remember one woman blurting out during our study, “Well, if I didn’t know any better, I’d think Jesus was claiming to be God.” It wasn’t long before her husband was telling me that they had come to faith in the course of their study of John’s Gospel.

For Christians, the Gospel of John is a source of much truth about our Lord and the Gospel. But it’s much more than this. It is an opportunity for us to “follow Him” as we read, and to identify with the disciples as their knowledge of Him continued to expand. It is our opportunity to get to know the heart of the Savior, and to fellowship with Him through His Word. If men of old found their hearts set on fire as they listened to Him teach in person (Luke 24:32), so we will find our hearts warmed as we seek to listen to Him through this Gospel.

The Gospel of John is of particular interest because of its unique approach—very different from the approach of the other three Gospels: Matthew, Mark, and Luke (sometimes called the “Synoptic Gospels”). Over 90% of the material in John’s Gospel is unique to John, not to be found in the other three Gospels.

This study also provides a unique opportunity to employ a new and exciting translation, known as The NET Bible, or the New English Translation. Several years ago the Biblical Studies Foundation sought to obtain permission to make a modern and accurate translation of the Bible available to readers around the world via the Internet. The cost of purchasing the rights to do so was prohibitive, and thus it was determined that a new translation was the better choice. The New American Standard Bible, famed for its accuracy, is not accepted and used internationally. In America, its popularity and use is diminishing. The NIV is a very readable and enjoyable translation, but it is not precise enough for serious students of the Bible. The New King James Version is becoming more popular, but it still suffers from some of the weaknesses of its predecessor. The NET Bible seeks to reflect the best of these great translations (readability, reliability, and the use of relevant language), in one new translation of the Bible.

The NET Bible is the first translation that has been designed to take advantage of the power of the computer for Bible Study, and the use of the Internet to make the Scriptures and Bible Study tools available around the world. The study notes and translators notes are the most extensive that have been made widely available. The Scripture citations in this series on the Gospel of John will therefore employ and showcase this exciting new translation, which can be used and shared for personal use (at no cost) with friends around the world.

This study in the Gospel of John is in progress. I am a teacher and elder at Community Bible Chapel in Richardson, Texas. As much as possible, a new lesson in the study of John will be posted on the Biblical Studies Foundation web site each week. I challenge you to join me in making the Gospel of John the subject of your study. May God use it to see Jesus Christ as the Son of God, who takes away the sin of the world, who takes away your sin.

That You Might Believe:
A Study of the Gospel of John

by
Robert Deffinbaugh
deffinbaugh@bible.org
Biblical Studies Press
www.bible.org
1998
 

Robert L. Deffinbaugh graduated from Dallas Theological Seminary with his Th.M. in 1971. Bob is a teacher and elder at Community Bible Chapel in Richardson, Texas, and has contributed many of his Bible study series for use by the Foundation.

Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from The NET Bible. The New English Translation, also known as The NET Bible, is a completely new translation of the Bible, not a revision or an update of a previous English version. It was completed by more than twenty biblical scholars who worked directly from the best currently available Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts. The translation project originally started as an attempt to provide an electronic version of a modern translation for electronic distribution over the Internet and on CD (compact disk). Anyone anywhere in the world with an Internet connection will be able to use and print out The NET Bible without cost for personal study. In addition, anyone who wants to share the Bible with others can print unlimited copies and give them away free to others. It is available on the Internet at: http://www.bible.org.

 

 

Introduction to the
Study of the Book of John

 

I feel a good deal like the late Dr. J. Vernon McGee as I attempt to introduce this study. In his “Through the Bible” series which he did on the radio and in print, Dr. McGee used to speak of each new book in his study as the “greatest book in the Bible.” Let’s face it, they’re all great. But there are certain books of the Bible that just seem to stand out, and the Gospel of John is surely one of those books. It is the book of the Bible we encourage non-Christians to read, in the hope that its message will lead them to faith in Christ (after all, that is the purpose of the book—see John 20:31). On previous occasions when I have taught John’s Gospel in home Bible studies, I have seen people come to faith as the message of this book captivated them. I well remember one woman blurting out during our study, “Well, if I didn’t know any better, I’d think Jesus was claiming to be God.” It wasn’t long before her husband was telling me that they had come to faith in the course of their study of John’s Gospel.

For Christians, the Gospel of John is a source of much truth about our Lord and the Gospel. But it’s much more than this. It is an opportunity for us to “follow Him” as we read, and to identify with the disciples as their knowledge of Him continued to expand. It is our opportunity to get to know the heart of the Savior, and to fellowship with Him through His Word. If men of old found their hearts set on fire as they listened to Him teach in person (Luke 24:32), so we will find our hearts warmed as we seek to listen to Him through this Gospel.

The Gospel of John is of particular interest because of its unique approach—very different from the approach of the other three Gospels: Matthew, Mark, and Luke (sometimes called the “Synoptic Gospels”). Over 90% of the material in John’s Gospel is unique to John, not to be found in the other three Gospels.

This study also provides a unique opportunity to employ a new and exciting translation, known as The NET Bible, or the New English Translation. Several years ago the Biblical Studies Foundation sought to obtain permission to make a modern and accurate translation of the Bible available to readers around the world via the Internet. The cost of purchasing the rights to do so was prohibitive, and thus it was determined that a new translation was the better choice. The New American Standard Bible, famed for its accuracy, is not accepted and used internationally. In America, its popularity and use is diminishing. The NIV is a very readable and enjoyable translation, but it is not precise enough for serious students of the Bible. The New King James Version is becoming more popular, but it still suffers from some of the weaknesses of its predecessor. The NET Bible seeks to reflect the best of these great translations (readability, reliability, and the use of relevant language), in one new translation of the Bible.

The NET Bible is the first translation that has been designed to take advantage of the power of the computer for Bible Study, and the use of the Internet to make the Scriptures and Bible Study tools available around the world. The study notes and translators notes are the most extensive that have been made widely available. The Scripture citations in this series on the Gospel of John will therefore employ and showcase this exciting new translation, which can be used and shared for personal use (at no cost) with friends around the world.

This study in the Gospel of John is in progress. I am a teacher and elder at Community Bible Chapel in Richardson, Texas. As much as possible, a new lesson in the study of John will be posted on the Biblical Studies Foundation web site each week. I challenge you to join me in making the Gospel of John the subject of your study. May God use it to see Jesus Christ as the Son of God, who takes away the sin of the world, who takes away your sin.


 

Lesson 1:
John: The Man and His Gospel

Introduction

In some scholarly circles, this message would not be considered worthy of a hearing. Leon Morris cites A. M. Hunter, who says, “‘For these and other reasons, scarcely a reputable scholar in this country nowadays is prepared to affirm that the Fourth Gospel was written by John the Apostle.’”[1]

Liberal scholarship has tended to the view that this Gospel was not written by John the Apostle, but by some anonymous second century Christian who “never set eyes on Jesus.”[2] If this were true, of what value could a study of John the Apostle be to the study of this great Gospel? I would like to explain why I believe it is of great value.

To begin, I believe the Gospel of John was written by the Apostle John.[3] There are a number of reasons we should accept the Johanine authorship of this Gospel. This was the conviction of the second century church fathers, who first addressed this matter.[4] This has always been the view of truly evangelical scholarship.[5] Morris comments, “The basic reason for holding that the author was John the Apostle is that this appears to be what the Gospel itself teaches.”[6]

In reading through the four Gospels, one finds that Matthew refers to the Apostle John by name three times; Mark ten times; Luke seven times, and John not at all. John does refer to the “sons of Zebedee” in 21:2, and there are allusions to himself in 13:23; 18:15-16; 19:26-27; 20:1-10; 21:7, 20-23, 24. It is not at all surprising that John would refrain from directly referring to himself by name. Neither does he specifically refer to the “inner three” (Peter, James, and John—see Mark 5:37; Matthew 17:1; Mark 14:33) in his Gospel. Of the four authors of the New Testament Gospels, two (Mark and especially Luke) were not present with our Lord as one of His 12 disciples. Matthew was not one of the inner three. And so while Matthew can write about our Lord’s ministry from the perspective of one of the nine “outside” disciples, it is only John who can describe certain critical events from the perspective of one of the inner three. Each Gospel thus has its own purpose, its own perspective, its own audience, and its own unique contribution.

John: The Man

The Gospels give us a fairly clear picture of the Apostle John. For us to understand John’s Gospel, we should consider the biographical sketch the Scriptures give us of this man.

Our first introduction to John may come in John 1:35-40. Here, John the Baptist looks upon Jesus and declares, “Look, the Lamb of God!” (John 1:36, NET). Immediately, two of John’s disciples leave him and attach themselves to Jesus. We are told that the name of one of these two men is Andrew (verse 40); the other disciple of John the Baptist is not named. I doubt that it was Peter, Andrew’s brother, because Andrew will find Peter and inform him that they have found the Messiah (verses 40-42). Since Peter and Andrew were partners of James and John, there is a fair chance that John the Apostle may be the second disciple of John the Baptist. It is interesting that John’s Gospel quickly turns our attention to “John the Baptist,” who is never called by this title in the Gospel of John; he is always referred to simply as “John.” This may be because the Apostle John knew him so well, as his former disciple.

Next, we read of the call of John and his brother James, right after the call of Peter and Andrew (Matthew 4:18-22; Mark 1:19). Jesus is walking along the shore of the Sea of Galilee. He first comes to Peter and Andrew, to whom He says, “Follow Me, Jesus said to them, and I will have you fish for people” (Mark 1:17). Next, He comes to James and John, who were sitting in the boat with their father mending their nets. He called them, and these two brothers immediately left their nets to follow Him. This does not appear to be a permanent leaving and following, which will take place later. It is a calling to leave their occupation for a time so that they can be with Him. John appears to be one of the first to follow our Lord as a disciple. If so, he was with Him from the beginning.

John, along with his brother James, accompanied Jesus to the home of Simon Peter and Andrew, where Jesus healed Simon’s mother-in-law, and then many others (Mark 1:29-31f.). According to Mark, this happened after Jesus taught in the synagogue of Capernaum. The people who heard Jesus were amazed because He, unlike the scribes and Pharisees, taught with authority (verses 22, 27). The authority which Jesus possessed was demonstrated by His ability to heal and to cast out demons. If anyone was a witness to the authority of our Lord, it was John who, along with Peter and James, witnessed more miracles at the hand of our Lord than nearly anyone.

During the time he spent with the Lord, John became increasingly aware of just how great and awesome Jesus was. In Luke 5:1-11, John’s grasp of who Jesus was takes a quantum leap. Jesus had been teaching the crowds beside the lake of Gennesaret (the Sea of Galilee). Two boats were nearby; one belonged to Simon and Andrew and the other to James and John. As Jesus taught, these men were in their boats, washing their nets after having fished all night without success. Jesus taught from one of the boats, and then instructed Peter to put out into deep water and to let down the nets for a catch. Peter momentarily protested, but then relented and let down the nets, which encompassed a very large catch. The catch was so large he had to call to his partners, James and John (verse 10), to help bring in the nets. They filled their boats until they began to sink. Seeing this, Peter fell trembling before our Lord with the words, “Go away from me, for I am a sinful man, Lord!” (verse 8). But the text also tells us that Peter’s partners, James and John, did likewise. Jesus’ words, “Do not be afraid, from now on you will be catching people,” were spoken to all three men, not just to Peter (see verse 10). John was on his way to understanding the majesty and power of the One he would follow.

John was chosen by our Lord to be numbered with the twelve (Matthew 10:1ff.; Mark 3:13-19; Luke 6:12-16). Mark informs us that at this time Jesus nicknamed James and John “sons of thunder” (Mark 3:17). This certainly squares with what we see of these two elsewhere. These two fellows were an ancient version of movie stars John Wayne and Clint Eastwood—they were a rough and tumble pair. John does not seem to have talked as much as Peter, but he was certainly one who could hold his own. He was the strong, silent type, the kind of fellow you would not want to make mad at you.

John was one of the “inner three” disciples of our Lord. Only Peter, James and John were allowed to accompany Jesus into the house of the synagogue official, whose daughter had already died before Jesus arrived (Mark 5:35-43; Luke 8:49-56). Here, apparently, John first witnessed our Lord’s power over death.

John was present at the transfiguration of Jesus, along with James and Peter (Matthew 17:1ff.; Mark 9:2ff.; Luke 9:28ff.). Here, John had a foretaste of the glory of our Lord and His kingdom. While Peter did not hesitate to speak on this occasion, John seems to have remained silent, perhaps having been dumbstruck by what he saw.

It was John who confessed that he and others had come across a man who was casting out demons in Jesus’ name and forbade him to do so again (Mark 9:38; Luke 9:49). John and others (which must have included at least Peter and James) had somehow concluded that they owned the “Jesus franchise,” and thus had the right to license or to prohibit others from acting in His name. Jesus did not agree, and He went on to warn them about causing “little ones to sin [stumble].”

It was James and John who asked Jesus for permission to call down fire from heaven and “torch the place” when some Samaritans did not want Jesus to come to their village (Luke 9:54). These two brothers were ready and willing to use God’s power to punish the pagans.

At a most inappropriate time, John, along with his brother James, asked Jesus for prominent positions in His coming kingdom (Mark 10:35). When Jesus was approaching Jerusalem, He told His disciples He was soon to be condemned to death there (Mark 10:32-34). As the time of our Lord’s death draws near, He takes His disciples into His confidence by telling them what is about to happen. It is as though James and John did not even hear what Jesus had just said. They took Jesus aside and asked Him privately to grant their request that they be given positions of prominence in the kingdom, above the other disciples. Naturally, the other disciples were incensed. James and John had no idea what they were asking, or what true discipleship really was.

Peter, James, and John, along with Andrew, privately asked Jesus to reveal to them details concerning the last days (Mark 13:1-4). Jesus and His disciples were in Jerusalem, and the disciples were awe-struck by the beauty of the temple. Jesus cautioned them not to become too attached to the temple since it was to be destroyed. The two sets of brothers waited until they could get Jesus alone, and then asked Him to tell them the “inside story” of what was going to happen and when. Actually, they were not so concerned with “what” would happen as “when” it would happen. They had the “what” figured out, they thought; they just needed to know “when.” Their seeking to obtain secret knowledge from Jesus, apart from the rest, was just another form of one-upmanship. There have always been—as there will always be—those who seek to obtain “inside” prophetic knowledge which is unknown by others. This inside knowledge enables some to think of themselves as superior to others.

When Jesus sent two of his disciples to make preparations for the Passover, one of these men was John and the other was Peter (Luke 22:8). Among other things, it seems these two (who would spend much time together in the Book of Acts) were the most trusted disciples. Judas could certainly not have been trusted to do this task. There was a certain mystery about the location of this meeting room, but these two were able to find it just as Jesus had indicated. There is an almost prophetic element in the way Jesus both informed and instructed these two, so that they could make preparations for celebrating the Passover, yet without allowing Judas to know where.

John seems to be the “disciple whom Jesus loved” in John 13:23, and the one who leaned on Jesus’ breast during the Passover celebration. Jesus and His disciples were in the upper room celebrating Passover. During the meal, Jesus told the disciples that one of them would betray Him. The disciples could hardly believe their ears. They had no idea whom He referred to as His betrayer. Peter was a close friend of John. They were not only partners in fishing but appear to have been close friends as well. It seems that John must be “the one Jesus loved” (verse 23), who was leaning on Jesus’ breast and to whom Peter signaled, hoping John would be able to press Jesus for more details.

John was there when our Lord agonized in the Garden of Gethsemane, along with Peter and James (Mark 14:33).

After our Lord was arrested, Peter followed Jesus, along with “another disciple” who appears to be John. It was this “other disciple” who was known to the high priest, and thus was able to enter the court of the high priest and bring Peter with him (John 18:15-16).

As our Lord was hanging on the cross, the “disciple whom Jesus loved” was there at the foot of the cross. From the cross, Jesus entrusted the care of His mother into this disciple’s hands. It seems that this man almost has to be John (see John 19:26-27).

John was one of the first to see the empty tomb and to believe that Jesus was indeed risen from the dead (John 20:1-10). After Jesus had been crucified, buried, and resurrected, Mary came to the tomb early in the morning on the first day of the week. When she found the stone already taken away, she ran to tell Peter and the “other disciple whom Jesus loved” about it. The “other disciple” (John) outran Peter, arriving first at the empty tomb. Looking in, he saw the linen wrappings, but he did not enter. When Peter arrived (huffing and puffing, I imagine), he barged right in and saw the grave clothes neatly arranged, but without the Lord’s body. John then entered the tomb, appraised the situation, and believed. John was not only one of the first to witness the resurrection, he was one of the very first to believe it.

John appears to be the “other disciple” about whose future Peter is inordinately concerned after our Lord’s resurrection (John 21:20-23). In John 21, we read of our Lord’s words to Peter, with the three-fold question, “Do you love Me?” After charging Peter to tend His sheep, our Lord informs Peter that he will be led away against his will, a veiled prophecy of his death as a martyr. Peter immediately looks in the direction of “the disciple whom Jesus loved” and asks, “What about him?” Our Lord replied that this was none of Peter’s business. Some seem to have mistakenly understood our Lord to mean that this “other disciple” would live until the Lord’s return. The Apostle John corrects this misconception, and then goes on to say that this same fellow is the one who witnessed the things recorded in his Gospel and who was the author of it (John 21:23-24). This “other apostle” is the one whom Jesus loved, the one who leaned on Jesus’ chest at the Passover meal, and who wrote the Book of John. This “other apostle” is almost certainly John.

We have not seen the last of John when we reach the end of the Gospels, for (apart from the Apostle Paul) John and Peter are the dominant apostles in the Book of Acts. John is one of the disciples gathered in the upper room (1:13). He accompanies Peter on his way to the temple at the hour of prayer and thus participates in the healing of the lame man (3:1ff.). John and Peter are arrested and instructed to cease preaching Christ by the Sadducees, but they refuse, insisting they must obey God rather than man by preaching that Jesus has been raised from the dead (Acts 4:1-22). When the Gospel is proclaimed in Samaria and many come to faith, Peter and John are sent there, and when they lay their hands on these new believers they receive the Holy Spirit, just as the apostles did at Pentecost (Acts 8:14-17). James, the brother of John, was killed by Herod, who intended to kill Peter as well, but God delivered Peter so that he could continue to preach the Gospel (Acts 12:1ff.).

In Galatians 2:9, Paul refers to John as one of the “reputed pillars” of the church in Jerusalem. John is, of course, the author of the Johanine Epistles (First, Second and Third John) and of the Book of Revelation. This one who once “leaned on Jesus’ chest” in the Gospel of John is also the one who “fell as a dead man” at the feet of his resurrected and glorified Lord in the Book of Revelation (1:17).


 

[1] A. M. Hunter, Introducing the New Testament (London, 1945), p. 50, as cited by Leon Morris, The Gospel According to John (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1971), p. 9.

[2] See Morris in footnote 1, p. 8.

[3] Some evangelical scholars believe that John is the source of this Gospel, but that he may have had help writing it, something akin to Mark writing his Gospel, but with Peter as his source. I am not convinced of this view, but neither would I call it heretical.

[4] “When we turn to the external evidence we are confronted by the fact that, while John the son of Zebedee is not named as the author of this Gospel in the earliest days, there is no other name in the tradition. The first person of whom we have record who definitely ascribes this Gospel to John appears to be Theophilus of Antioch (c. A.D. 180). Irenaeus also says it was written by John the Apostle, and his source appears to have been Polycarp, who knew John personally.” Leon Morris, p. 21.

[5] “The Fourth Gospel has been designated since the second century ‘according to John’; and this has been taken to imply in Christian tradition that the authority of the apostle John, the son of Zebedee, lies behind it, and that it embodies his testimony to the life and teaching of Jesus. The present commentator is in full agreement with the dictum of the late Archbishop William Temple, who wrote: ‘I regard as self-condemned any theory about the origin of the Gospel which fails to find a very close connection between it and John the son of Zebedee. The combination of internal and external evidence is overwhelming on this point.’” R. V. G. Tasker, The Gospel According to St. John: An Introduction and Commentary (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1980 [tenth printing]), p. 11.

[6] Morris, p. 9; see John 21:24.

More at http://bible.org/series/you-might-believe-study-gospel-john


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Send comments about web site to: WebMaster@comedition.com
Copyright © 1996-2004 EDA, Inc.. All rights reserved.
Revised: April 06, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 1999-2000 EDA, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.